The Supreme Court has issued a detailed written verdict on the appeal of convict Younis Masih. He had been sentenced in a child rape case involving a 10-year-old girl.
The court reduced his death penalty to life imprisonment. However, it upheld several other parts of the earlier judgment.
Justice Salahuddin Panhor issued the written order. The decision has drawn attention due to its legal and social implications.
Fine and Compensation Orders Maintained
The court maintained the fine of Rs300,000 imposed on the convict. It also upheld an additional six-month imprisonment.
Furthermore, the court confirmed the compensation order of Rs100,000 for the victim. This compensation was issued under the Anti-Rape Act.
The judgment reinforced that legal accountability remains intact despite the reduction in sentence.
Court Emphasizes Protection of Students
In its verdict, the Supreme Court highlighted the state’s constitutional responsibility. It stated that protecting female students in educational institutions is a fundamental duty.
The court directed provincial inspectors general and the Islamabad IG to strengthen police presence. It ordered increased patrols outside schools, colleges, and universities.
Additionally, it instructed law enforcement to respond immediately to harassment complaints involving women and children.
Recommendations for Legal and Medical Reform
The verdict also included recommendations for government institutions. The court suggested establishing a modern medico-legal system.
It referenced the Sindh Medical Legal Act 2023 as a model for reform. The aim is to improve forensic and medical-legal services across provinces.
These recommendations were made to ensure faster and more reliable legal processes in sensitive cases.
Background Details Referenced in Judgment
The case involved a school sweeper in Sheikhupura who was accused of raping a 10-year-old student. The medical report confirmed injuries consistent with assault.
However, forensic reports did not detect semen. The court noted that this did not eliminate the possibility of guilt.
The judgment also addressed procedural delays. It stated that filing an FIR three days after the incident does not automatically grant benefit of doubt.
School Response and Court Observations
According to the verdict, the school administration attempted to conceal the incident. It was also noted that medical assistance was provided within the school.
The court observed that such delays and concealment cannot be used against the victim. It emphasized that responsibility lies with the accused, not procedural gaps.
The convict’s claims of false implication and unrelated altercation were also rejected. The court found no supporting evidence for those arguments.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court has commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment while maintaining penalties and compensation. At the same time, it has issued strong directives for protecting children in educational institutions.
The verdict also calls for improved policing and better medico-legal systems, reinforcing the need for stronger safeguards for vulnerable groups.
