PTI
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) is actively considering a reshuffle within its core and political committees, as the party seeks to realign its internal structure amid ongoing political challenges.
Senior party members are reportedly engaged in serious discussions over the removal of controversial figures from key positions, with Shahbaz Gill among those whose roles are under review.
According to party insiders, these proposed changes are being deliberated with input from PTI’s incarcerated founding chairman, Imran Khan. Despite his imprisonment, Khan’s approval remains critical for any significant organizational restructuring within the party.
One major development in this regard has already taken place. The PTI has officially dissolved its Foreign Affairs and International Relations Committee, a body that was formed on January 28, 2025.
The committee included notable members such as Zulfi Bukhari, Sajjad Burki, Shahbaz Gill, and Atif Khan. The dissolution was confirmed through a formal notification issued by Barrister Gohar Khan, who is acting on behalf of Imran Khan.
Sources suggest that this move came in response to growing concerns from PTI’s overseas supporters, particularly its influential US chapter.
A group of American-based PTI activists reportedly raised alarms about the direction the committee was taking, prompting communication with Imran Khan that led to its disbandment.
The US chapter of PTI appears increasingly divided on the party’s approach to Pakistan’s military establishment. Some members maintain a confrontational stance against the military leadership, while others are now advocating for reconciliation and dialogue.
This internal division became more evident following a recent visit by a delegation of US-based doctors and businessmen to Islamabad. During their visit, they met with a senior government official and also visited Imran Khan at Adiala Jail.
Their attempts at bridging differences with the military drew criticism from PTI’s hardline factions, especially those involved in the party’s aggressive online campaigns.
Leaders supporting a softer, dialogue-driven approach argue that any meaningful reconciliation with the establishment is unlikely to succeed while hawkish voices within the party continue targeting military figures.
As PTI strategizes for future political maneuvering, the removal of polarizing individuals from strategic roles may signal a broader effort to create space for negotiation and ultimately secure relief for Imran Khan, whose release remains a top priority for the party.
