Nineteen apartment owners at One Constitution Avenue have challenged part of a recent court decision regarding the property’s lease cancellation.
The residents filed an intra-court appeal in the Islamabad High Court. They specifically questioned certain observations made in the April 30 judgment.
According to the petition, the appeal targets paragraph 37 of the ruling. The apartment owners argue that the observations related to third-party rights could affect lawful residents.
As a result, they requested the court to amend or remove those remarks.
Residents Seek Protection From Eviction
The apartment owners also asked the court to stop authorities from taking immediate action against residents.
In addition, they requested restraining orders against the Islamabad administration and police.
The petition urges the court to prevent forced evictions from the apartments. Furthermore, the residents asked the court to stop any alleged harassment by government authorities.
The appeal also seeks protection from sudden utility disconnections.
According to the filing, residents fear interruptions in electricity and gas supplies while the dispute remains unresolved.
Therefore, they requested clear court directions against such actions.
CDA Asked to Avoid Coercive Measures
The petitioners urged the court to stop the Capital Development Authority from pressuring residents to leave the property.
Moreover, they requested that no resident should be forced to vacate the apartments before a mutually acceptable solution emerges.
The appeal states that authorities should avoid eviction measures until a proper grievance process is completed.
Additionally, the residents emphasized the need for a fair settlement mechanism.
They argued that apartment owners deserve representation in discussions connected to the ongoing dispute.
Apartment Owners Demand Inclusion in Settlement Process
The petition also calls for direct involvement of apartment owners in future consultations.
According to the appeal, residents should have the opportunity to present their concerns during any settlement or compensation proceedings.
Furthermore, the petitioners asked the court to direct the CDA to hear their position before taking further decisions.
The residents believe their ownership rights should receive legal protection during the dispute resolution process.
Legal Dispute Draws Public Attention
The One Constitution Avenue case has attracted growing attention due to its legal and residential implications.
Many residents remain concerned about uncertainty surrounding their homes and property rights.
At the same time, the legal battle highlights broader questions regarding third-party ownership protections in large housing projects.
Consequently, the outcome of the appeal may significantly impact future proceedings connected to the property.
Conclusion
The apartment owners at One Constitution Avenue are seeking legal relief against possible eviction and utility disconnections.
Their appeal focuses on protecting residents’ rights while pushing for inclusion in any future settlement discussions.
