Students challenge demolition order as legal battle and political debate continue
RAMPUR: Students, alumni and local residents have intensified protests against the proposed demolition of most buildings at Mohammad Ali Jauhar University in Uttar Pradesh, arguing that the move threatens the future of thousands of students.
The demonstrations began after the Rampur Development Authority (RDA) issued a July 15 order directing the university to demolish 38 of its 40 buildings by August 5, alleging they were constructed without the required approvals. Authorities warned that if the university failed to comply, the administration would carry out the demolition and recover the costs.
Although the state administration later issued an interim stay on the order, university officials said it only delayed the deadline and did not cancel the demolition proceedings. The university has challenged the order in court.
Authorities cite regulations; university disputes allegations
The RDA maintains that only two buildings were constructed with valid approvals and says the remaining structures violate planning regulations.
However, Vice Chancellor Zaheeruddin disputes the allegations, arguing that the university was built before the area came under the RDA’s jurisdiction in 2024. He maintains that retrospective approval cannot be demanded and says the institution has received recognition from relevant educational authorities.
The university was established by the Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust, founded by veteran politician Azam Khan. Supporters allege the action is politically motivated, while the Uttar Pradesh government denies the claim and says it is enforcing planning laws equally.
Students vow to continue peaceful campaign
Students say the proposed demolition would disrupt the education of nearly 3,000 enrolled learners, including many women who chose the university because of its academic environment and campus security.
Several protesters also alleged that police had pressured families to discourage participation in the demonstrations, a claim authorities have not publicly addressed.
The dispute has sparked wider political debate, with opposition leaders describing the action as discriminatory, while government representatives insist the issue concerns alleged illegal construction rather than politics.
As legal proceedings continue, protesters say they will maintain their peaceful sit-in until the demolition order is withdrawn or overturned by the courts.
