Sunni Ittehad Council Challenges ECP’s Decision in Lahore High Court

The Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) has embarked on a legal journey against what it perceives as an unjust move by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) regarding the allocation of reserved seats in Punjab. In a strategic maneuver, the SIC has filed a challenge in the Lahore High Court, signaling its resolve to address perceived electoral injustices through legal recourse.

Represented by Sahibzada Hamid Raza, the SIC submitted a comprehensive application naming the commission and other relevant parties as respondents. At the heart of the matter lies the contention that the SIC was denied its rightful share of reserved seats in Punjab despite repeated requests and adherence to established rules and laws.

The petitioner’s argument hinges on the claim that the ECP failed to uphold the principles outlined in Section 104 of the Elections Act, which allegedly contradicts Article 51 of the Constitution. Moreover, the SIC challenges the authority of the ECP to act as a tribunal or court, calling into question the constitutionality of Section 104 and Rule 94 of the Elections Act.

The legal challenge underscores the SIC’s unwavering determination to address perceived violations of its electoral rights within the existing framework. The outcome of the court’s decision holds significant implications for the electoral process and the interpretation of relevant laws governing reserved seats.

This development follows the ECP’s earlier decision to reject the SIC’s request for reserved seats in the Punjab Assembly, citing procedural shortcomings. The SIC’s legal battle, initiated in response to the ECP’s decision, reflects broader concerns regarding constitutional overreach and adherence to electoral laws.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the case represents a critical juncture in Pakistan’s electoral landscape, shaping the future trajectory of political representation and governance. The Lahore High Court’s verdict will address the SIC’s immediate concerns and set important precedents for future electoral disputes and legal interpretations within the country’s democratic framework.