The Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) announced CSS 2026 written examination results on Monday. Only 476 candidates qualified for the next stage of the competitive selection process.
According to the FPSC, 24,321 candidates submitted applications for the examination. Meanwhile, 17,351 candidates appeared in the written test. Of these, 16,342 candidates appeared in all examination papers.
The overall pass rate stood at just 2.74%, highlighting the competitive nature of the examination. Among the successful candidates, 239 were men and 237 were women.
FPSC Releases List of Successful Candidates
The commission has also released the list of candidates who successfully qualified for the written examination. Candidates can check their names through the official FPSC results announcement.
Furthermore, successful candidates will receive information about the next stages. These stages include medical examinations, psychological assessments and viva voce.
The FPSC will conduct these stages before finalising candidates for appointment to various government services. Therefore, candidates who cleared the written examination must prepare for the remaining selection process.
CSS Candidates Move to Next Selection Stage
The CSS 2026 written examination took place from February 4 to February 15. Thousands of candidates competed for opportunities through the country’s prestigious civil service examination.
However, only a small percentage managed to clear the written stage. Consequently, the successful candidates now face further assessments before final selection.
The FPSC congratulated all candidates who successfully passed the written examination. It also wished them success in the remaining stages of the competitive selection process.
Meanwhile, candidates who qualified should carefully follow FPSC instructions regarding upcoming assessments. The commission will provide further details about medical, psychological and viva voce requirements.
The CSS examination remains one of Pakistan’s most competitive government recruitment processes. This year’s results again reflected the rigorous standards applied during the written assessment.
