Following the conviction of former ISI Director General Lt Gen (Retd) Faiz Hamid, speculation has emerged regarding possible legal action against former army chief Gen (Retd) Qamar Javed Bajwa.
However, informed sources have clarified that there is neither any investigation nor any legal proceeding against Gen (Retd) Bajwa.
They described circulating claims as baseless and unsupported by any evidence.
The military accountability process that led to Lt Gen (Retd) Faiz’s conviction was strictly evidence-based.
It focused solely on his individual actions, with no material linking Gen (Retd) Bajwa to the case.
Broader Accountability Expected Beyond Military
Sources suggest that while no action is underway against Gen (Retd) Bajwa, the post-Faiz scenario could pave the way for broader accountability.
This process may extend to judges, bureaucrats, politicians, and media personnel who allegedly overstepped constitutional and legal limits in the past.
Authorities aim to ensure that responsibility is fixed across all institutions, not selectively applied.
A military spokesperson previously highlighted the transparency of the accountability system.
He emphasized that proceedings are based on solid evidence rather than allegations or assumptions. Questions about former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s potential trial under the Army Act were termed hypothetical and sub judice.
The spokesperson also clarified that the role of Gen (Retd) Bajwa and former ISI DG Lt Gen (Retd) Naveed Mukhtar in the appointment of Gen (Retd) Faiz is unrelated to the convicted officer’s personal actions. Officials stressed that linking others without evidence would be unfair and contrary to legal principles.
Focus on Constitutional and Legal Boundaries
The conviction of Lt Gen (Retd) Faiz demonstrates the military’s commitment to enforcing constitutional and legal limits.
Sources indicate that accountability may now expand to civilian institutions that allegedly facilitated or benefited from unconstitutional conduct.
Such measures are considered essential to uphold the rule of law and prevent selective justice.
Experts believe the post-Faiz environment encourages vigilance and scrutiny across multiple sectors.
By ensuring fair and evidence-based accountability, authorities aim to reinforce institutional integrity and public trust.
