Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Latest Updates

Supreme Court: General Zia Needed Bhutto’s Conviction for Political Survival

ISLAMABAD: In a landmark 48-page order issued on Monday, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has acknowledged that former prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was denied a fair trial, attributing this to the influence of former dictator General Zia-ul-Haq. This detailed order comes in response to a presidential reference filed by former president Asif Ali Zardari over a decade ago.

The Supreme Court’s detailed order emphasized that General Zia-ul-Haq’s personal survival and the continuation of his usurped power were contingent on Bhutto being found guilty. “The continuation of usurped power required Mr. Bhutto to be convicted,” the order stated, highlighting the compromised nature of the trial and appellate proceedings.

In March, the Supreme Court admitted that Bhutto was not provided the right to a fair trial, nearly 44 years after the Pakistan Peoples Party’s founding chairman was executed in a murder case. The short order pointed out that the proceedings of the trial by the Lahore High Court and the appeal by the Supreme Court did not fulfill the requirements of fundamental rights to a fair trial and due process.

Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa, who authored the order, criticized the legal environment during Bhutto’s trial. He noted that both the trial court and the appellate court operated under a regime where constitutional rule was absent, and General Zia-ul-Haq’s will had replaced the democratic order. “Was it not obvious that General Zia-ul-Haq would be the direct beneficiary of a guilty verdict? If Mr. Bhutto was acquitted, he may have proceeded to prosecute General Zia-ul-Haq for the crime of high treason,” the order asserted.

The Supreme Court’s order further declared that the trial and appellate courts that conducted Bhutto’s trial were not genuine courts under the Constitution. It emphasized that during the Martial Law, the country’s judiciary was under the control of the dictatorship. “The country was captive to Martial Law and so too were its courts. When judges take an oath of allegiance to dictators, the courts are no longer of the people,” the order concluded.

This historic acknowledgment by the Supreme Court marks a significant moment in Pakistan’s judicial history, shedding light on the political manipulation and denial of justice that occurred during General Zia-ul-Haq’s regime.

Written By

I am an accomplished graduate of Strategic Studies, driven by a fervent dedication to comprehending global affairs and devising impactful strategies. Equipped with a comprehensive skill set encompassing research, critical thinking, and persuasive communication, I possess a distinctive viewpoint and an unwavering commitment to fostering inclusive decision-making processes. As a versatile individual, I excel in collaborating with diverse groups in various settings, leveraging my strong interpersonal abilities to adapt seamlessly to new environments and surmount any challenges that arise. With a passion for contributing to strategic initiatives, I am eager to leverage my expertise and drive to effect positive change within the field.

Latest Updates

MULTAN/ISLAMABAD: Students at Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture in Multan have launched protests following the tragic death of a female student, Manahil, who...

Health & Education

MDCAT 2024 Khyber Medical University (KMU) has officially announced the results of the Medical and Dental College Admission Test (MDCAT). This year’s results highlighted...

Sports

Norwegian Footballer Norwegian footballer Ole Saeter, who is eligible to represent Pakistan through his maternal lineage, has made headlines by rejecting a lucrative offer...

National

In Umerkot, Sindh, a mob seized the body of Dr. Shah Nawaz Kumbhar, a blasphemy suspect reportedly killed in a police encounter, and set...