Sarah Adams
Former CIA officer Sarah Adams has made explosive claims about the International Advisory Group (IAG), accusing it of fabricating reports regarding the deaths of key leaders of the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP)—Gul Murad Khalimov, Omar Farooq, and Qais Laghmani.
According to Adams, these false reports were part of a deliberate attempt by the IAG to mislead Western powers and divert attention away from its covert operations.
Adams’ revelations about the IAG’s deception are not limited to these death reports. She previously exposed that India had made payments totaling $10 million to the Taliban’s Ministry of Defence, which were reportedly used to target militants in Pakistan, including Kashmiri separatists, Khalistani insurgents, and other militant groups.
Adams expressed grave concerns about the global security implications of these covert activities, noting that such operations could destabilize the region further.
In her statements, Adams argued that the IAG’s manipulation of death reports regarding ISKP leaders was part of a larger strategy to deceive Western intelligence agencies.
She pointed out that these actions reflect the IAG’s duplicitous approach, playing a dangerous double game in undermining international counterterrorism efforts.
Her findings echoed longstanding warnings from Pakistani circles that the IAG had been engaged in covert activities that could be detrimental to regional stability.
The disclosure provided further credibility to Pakistan’s concerns that India had been waging a covert war through Afghan proxies, using secretive means to achieve its goals in the region.
Adams’ expose, corroborated by testimonies from Western intelligence officers, revealed a web of misinformation and covert alliances that had previously been downplayed or dismissed as unfounded.
Adams’ revelations have raised alarming questions about the true nature of counterterrorism operations in the region. What was once viewed as a localized security issue has now evolved into a global security threat.
The silence of the IAG in response to these claims has only intensified suspicions about its role in allowing terrorism to proliferate under the guise of counterterrorism victories.
These disclosures have cast serious doubt on the IAG’s supposed success in combating groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda, prompting widespread scrutiny of its true intentions and involvement in global security operations.
