Meddling Case
Journalist Hamid Mir has characterized the judicial meddling case as a formidable challenge for Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa, who leads a seven-member Supreme Court bench overseeing the case.
Mir, speaking on the show Rubaroo, expressed concern over the seriousness of the allegations against intelligence agencies and the judges’ complaints.
Reflecting on his own experience with a judicial commission formed after a 2014 attempt on his life, Mir highlighted the difficulties in summoning individuals and obtaining cooperation.
He recounted how, despite naming a prime suspect before the commission, the individual failed to appear and only submitted a statement through the defense ministry. Mir emphasized the gravity of the situation for the CJP, given the judges’ allegations and the complexities of the case.
In March, six judges from the Islamabad High Court penned a letter to the Supreme Judicial Council, alleging interference by intelligence agencies in judicial affairs, including abduction, torture, and surveillance.
CJP Isa, during proceedings on April 3, affirmed zero tolerance for assaults on judicial autonomy and hinted at convening a full court session.
Mir also discussed political developments, noting the lukewarm reception received by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif upon his return.
He shared insights on PML-N leader Khawaja Saad Rafique’s reservations about contesting elections due to delimitations and uncertain political dynamics.
Mir clarified his relationship with President Asif Ali Zardari, stating that while Zardari might consider him a friend, he does not reciprocate the sentiment entirely.
He lamented the prevailing polarization in Pakistan’s political landscape, underscoring the need for dialogue among key political figures despite existing divides.
Overall, Mir’s comments underscore the multifaceted challenges facing Pakistan’s judiciary and political sphere, with implications for governance, accountability, and democratic stability.
