Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Latest Updates

Supreme Court resumes hearing petitions challenging civilians’ trials in military courts

ISLAMABAD: A larger bench consisting of six members, headed by Chief Justice Umar Atta Bandial, resumed hearing petitions challenging the trials of civilians in military courts under the Army Act 1952.

Other members of the bench include Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Mazahir Ali Akbar Naqvi, and Justice Ayesha A Malik.

The federal government requested the Supreme Court to dismiss all the petitions challenging the military court trials of civilians. The government argued that violence against the military and vandalism of army installations directly threatened Pakistan’s national security.

The defense of military trials was based on the constitutional obligation of the Armed Forces to defend Pakistan. The government asserted that a trial by court-martial does not infringe upon the rights guaranteed by the law.

The bench will also hear the petition of Supreme Court Bar President Abid Zubiri. The government’s response emphasized that unknown assailants targeted multiple military installations and establishments during the incidents on May 9. The attacks were organized and well-coordinated. The government argued that these events were premeditated. They were intentional attempts to undermine the country’s armed forces and national security.

Imran khan

A Matter of National Concern

The government further stated that the issues raised in the petitions are of critical importance to Pakistan’s national security. The constitutional framework permits the trial of perpetrators of violence and vandalism under the Army Act to serve as a deterrent. The government cited the cases of Shakeel Afridi and Kulbhushan Jadhav. These are evidence of foreign powers constantly working to destabilize the armed forces and weaken national security.

The government asserted that the law provides comprehensive protection for the fair trial rights of the accused individuals. It referred to previous judgments, such as the F B Ali and Said Zaman Khan cases, where the court found favorable regarding the procedural and substantive protections provided for trials under the Army Act.

Written By

I am an accomplished graduate of Strategic Studies, driven by a fervent dedication to comprehending global affairs and devising impactful strategies. Equipped with a comprehensive skill set encompassing research, critical thinking, and persuasive communication, I possess a distinctive viewpoint and an unwavering commitment to fostering inclusive decision-making processes. As a versatile individual, I excel in collaborating with diverse groups in various settings, leveraging my strong interpersonal abilities to adapt seamlessly to new environments and surmount any challenges that arise. With a passion for contributing to strategic initiatives, I am eager to leverage my expertise and drive to effect positive change within the field.

Entertainment

TikTok influencer Minahil Malik recently addressed the unauthorized circulation of a video featuring her in a response posted on her TikTok account. In her...

Breaking News

A video allegedly featuring Dolphin Ayan, a well-known transgender figure in Peshawar, has gone viral on social media. In response, Ayan filed a police...

Breaking News

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock was shocked upon arriving in China on Monday when no officials were there to greet her, prompting her to...

Latest Updates

Bakhtawar Bhutto Zardari has revealed the name of her third son, Mir Zulfikar, born on October 20, 2024. The announcement was shared through her...