US President Donald Trump has confirmed that the US is negotiating with Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf as claimed by a US journalist
Trump stated that discussions have taken place in recent weeks. He added that the United States will know “in about a week” whether Ghalibaf is someone America can truly work with.
The confirmation marks a rare public acknowledgment of a specific Iranian official involved in backchannel diplomacy.
A Shift From Previous Caution
Until now, US officials avoided naming the Iranian counterpart engaged in talks. Speculation had circulated that Ghalibaf served as Washington’s preferred conduit.
However, authorities refrained from confirming his identity publicly. Trump indicated that publicly naming individuals could place them at risk.
Therefore, the announcement suggests either increased confidence or a calculated diplomatic move.
Why Ghalibaf Matters
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf currently serves as Iran’s parliamentary speaker. He also has a background linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
His past positions have often aligned with hardline policies. As a result, his involvement in negotiations has drawn attention among diplomatic observers.
Some analysts believe his institutional standing gives him leverage within Iran’s political system. Others question whether he holds sufficient authority to finalize major agreements.
Nevertheless, Trump signaled that Washington is willing to test that possibility.
One Week to Assess Cooperation
According to Trump, the coming days will determine whether Ghalibaf can serve as a viable partner. He suggested that Washington seeks practical outcomes rather than symbolic dialogue.
The president emphasized that engagement does not guarantee agreement. Instead, it provides an opportunity to assess intentions and capability.
Meanwhile, diplomatic discussions reportedly continue amid broader regional tensions.
Balancing Risk and Opportunity
Public confirmation of the talks introduces new dynamics into the US–Iran equation. On one hand, naming a counterpart signals seriousness about negotiations.
On the other hand, it increases scrutiny around the individual involved.
Trump’s remarks suggest cautious optimism. However, uncertainty remains over whether discussions will lead to tangible results.
For now, both sides appear to be exploring whether common ground exists. The next week could clarify whether dialogue progresses or stalls.
