A United States federal appeals court has upheld an $83.3 million jury verdict against former President Donald Trump. The ruling stems from defamatory remarks Trump made in 2019 against writer E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of sexual assault nearly three decades earlier.
Appeals Court Rejects Immunity Argument
Trump had argued that he was entitled to presidential immunity, claiming his statements about Carroll were made in his official capacity. However, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected this reasoning. Judges ruled that his repeated attacks on Carroll, particularly as the trial neared, went beyond acceptable boundaries.
The court emphasized that the degree of Trump’s misconduct was “remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented.” The decision highlighted that his words caused ongoing emotional harm and reputational damage to Carroll, warranting the substantial award.
Background of the Case
Carroll, now 81, accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in the mid-1990s inside a department store dressing room. Trump, who was 79 at the time of the trial, denied the allegations and dismissed Carroll by saying she was “not my type.” He later repeated these statements on social media, sparking further legal action.
In May 2023, a jury held Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million. That verdict was upheld in June 2024. The more recent $83.3 million award includes $18.3 million for reputational and emotional harm and $65 million in punitive damages.
Court’s View on Punitive Damages
The appeals court found the damages justified, citing Trump’s malicious intent and continuous attacks over a five-year period. The judges wrote that his actions involved malice and deceit, caused serious emotional injury, and demanded accountability.
They dismissed Trump’s claim that the Supreme Court’s 2024 decision on presidential criminal immunity should apply. According to the ruling, immunity does not extend to civil liability for defamatory remarks.
Trump’s Other Legal Challenges
The case adds to Trump’s extensive legal troubles following his presidency. He is appealing other verdicts, including his May 2024 criminal conviction for falsifying records to conceal a sex scandal. Although he avoided prison time in that case, he remains entangled in multiple legal battles.
In addition, Trump faced a civil fraud case brought by New York’s attorney general. While an appeals court later reduced a significant financial penalty, the proceedings intensified scrutiny on his business practices.
Responses from Both Sides
Trump’s legal team issued a statement rejecting the verdict, claiming it was part of “liberal lawfare” against him. They insisted Trump remained focused on his political mission. Meanwhile, Carroll’s lawyer welcomed the decision, expressing hope that justice would soon reach its conclusion.
Carroll’s Memoir and Public Stand
Carroll has also shared her story through her memoirs. Her book “What Do We Need Men For?” initially detailed her allegations, while her recent release, “Not My Type: One Woman vs. a President,” explores her lengthy legal battle against Trump.
The ruling reaffirms that Trump must pay Carroll $83.3 million in damages for defamation. The appeals court’s rejection of his immunity argument establishes a clear precedent: presidential status cannot shield defamatory statements made with malice.
The case not only strengthens Carroll’s pursuit of justice but also underscores broader questions about accountability for public figures.
