Brazil’s Supreme Court has sentenced former president Jair Bolsonaro to 27 years in prison on charges of coup plotting, marking a landmark ruling that has split the country and sparked strong reactions abroad.
The 70-year-old far-right leader was convicted in a 4-1 vote by the justices, who found him guilty of attempting to overthrow Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva after losing the October 2022 presidential election. The ruling means Bolsonaro could spend the remainder of his life behind bars.
Prosecutors argued that Bolsonaro had actively sought to incite and organize a coup but ultimately failed due to lack of backing from top military commanders. His defense denounced the decision as “incredibly excessive” and vowed to appeal both domestically and “at the international level.”
The United States was among the first to respond. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denounced the ruling as a politically motivated “witch hunt,” warning that Washington “will respond accordingly.” In turn, Brazil’s foreign ministry rejected Rubio’s remarks, declaring that Brazil would not bow to external pressure or “threats.”
U.S. President Donald Trump also voiced support for Bolsonaro, calling the verdict “very surprising.” He described his Brazilian counterpart as a “good man” and a “good president,” drawing parallels between Bolsonaro’s legal battles and his own.
Trump had previously clashed with Bolsonaro on trade during his presidency, notably imposing tariffs, but has continued to maintain a warm personal rapport with him.
Justice Cristiano Zanin, once Lula’s personal lawyer, cast the decisive fifth vote, affirming that “an armed criminal organization was formed by the defendants, who must be convicted based on the factual circumstances I consider proven.” His statement sealed the conviction, underscoring the court’s view that Bolsonaro’s actions posed a grave threat to Brazil’s democracy.
The verdict has deepened political divisions in Brazil, where Bolsonaro remains a polarizing figure. Supporters view him as a victim of political persecution, while critics argue his conviction is essential for safeguarding democratic institutions.
