The Asian Cricket Council (ACC) has uncovered evidence suggesting that match referee Andy Pycroft displayed partiality during the high-profile Pakistan versus India clash in the Asia Cup 2025. The findings have raised serious concerns about the neutrality of cricket officials, sparking a wave of criticism from fans and officials alike.
Allegations of Collusion and Code Violations
According to the inquiry, Pycroft engaged in actions that breached established protocols. During the toss, he reportedly instructed Pakistan captain Salman Ali Agha to switch off his microphone, which contradicted rules governing match transparency. Furthermore, the referee allegedly told Agha not to shake hands with Indian skipper Suryakumar Yadav, despite regulations stating that referees are not authorized to issue such instructions directly to players.
The probe further revealed that Pycroft prevented Agha from making certain remarks moments before the game began. Investigators described this as a “pre-planned” tactic intended to limit potential controversy.
Shielding Indian Players
The controversy deepened when evidence suggested that Pycroft overlooked disciplinary action against Indian batsman Suryakumar Yadav, who allegedly used the phrase “Operation Sindoor.” Sources claim the referee deliberately ignored the incident to protect the player from fines.
This selective enforcement of rules has fueled accusations of bias, with many suggesting the referee colluded with Indian officials to influence match proceedings.
PCB’s Strong Protest
The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has formally accused Pycroft of violating the ICC Code of Conduct and the Spirit of Cricket. PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi demanded his removal, labeling the referee’s actions as a breach of cricketing protocol.
In protest, PCB threatened to withdraw from the Asia Cup 2025 if Pycroft continues officiating. Reports indicate that if Pakistan forfeits its next match, the UAE would automatically advance in the tournament, eliminating Pakistan from contention.
ICC Rejects PCB’s Request
Despite the mounting pressure, the International Cricket Council (ICC) has rejected PCB’s demand to replace Pycroft. Officials clarified that Pycroft was following ACC’s directive regarding the no-handshake rule at the toss, dismissing claims that he acted in India’s favor.
The ICC emphasized that match referees are appointed in coordination with the ACC and reaffirmed that Pycroft would continue his duties, including officiating Pakistan’s next fixture against the UAE.
Handshake Controversy Adds Fuel
Tensions escalated after India’s win, when Suryakumar Yadav and Shivam Dube left the field without the customary handshake. While Pakistan’s squad, led by Agha and coach Mike Hesson, later approached India’s dressing room to uphold tradition, the Indian players shut their door, refusing the gesture.
The refusal sparked outrage among fans and officials, further amplifying Pakistan’s demands for accountability.
Broader Implications for Cricket Governance
The allegations against Pycroft have brought the spotlight back on cricket’s governing structures, particularly the relationship between the ACC and ICC. Critics argue that the lack of transparency in appointing and monitoring referees undermines the credibility of international tournaments.
The PCB has also submitted a request that Pycroft not be appointed as referee for the upcoming home series against South Africa in October. Whether this demand will be accepted remains uncertain.
As Pakistan continues consultations with the ACC and other stakeholders, the controversy threatens to overshadow the Asia Cup. With the ICC refusing to remove Pycroft, tensions between the PCB and international cricketing authorities are likely to escalate.
Fans and experts are now calling for the full investigation report to be made public. Many argue that ensuring fairness and transparency is essential for preserving the spirit of cricket in high-stakes tournaments.
