About 400 projects initiated by the Indian government and investors in Afghanistan are at stake after Taliban’s takeover of their country after two decade-long war with the US and NATO forces.
New Delhi invested more than $3 billion in development projects, offered scholarships to Afghan students, and helped construct the parliament building at a cost of $90m, earning huge goodwill in the country of 38 million.
Last year, during the 2020 Afghanistan Conference, Indiaโs External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said no part of Afghanistan was โuntouchedโ by the โ400-plus projectsโ that India had undertaken in all 34 provinces of the country.
Bilateral trade between the two countries had also increased significantly over the years and reached $1.5bn in 2019-2020.
The Talibanโs return to power a couple of weeks ago has caused a major diplomatic setback for India, with the South Asian giant now one of the regionโs โmost disadvantagedโ players, analysts say, reports Al-Jazeera.
Last week Taliban have given a shut-up call to Indian rulers for levelling baseless allegations against Taliban, which is a clear sign of rift between the two sides.
Importantly, Modi government is still silent about its huge investment in Afghanistan while Indian media is raising hue and cry over Taliban control in the country.

Within weeks, the Taliban took over the country in a stunning military sweep, as US-led foreign forces were on their way out after 20 years โ ending the countryโs longest overseas war.
President Ashraf Ghani, with whom New Delhi cultivated a close relationship, fled the country as the Taliban surrounded the capital, Kabul.
The sudden collapse of the Western-backed government in Kabul on August 15 precipitated an unprecedented exodus of diplomats, foreign aid workers and Afghans who worked for Western countries and feared reprisals from the Taliban.

India was among the nations that closed their missions in Afghanistan and brought back their staff and citizens. It is still trying to evacuate some citizens left behind amid chaotic conditions at the Kabul airport.
India, under Operation Devi Shakti, has already evacuated more than 800 people from Afghanistan after Kabul was captured by the Taliban.

On Thursday, it could evacuate only 24 of its citizens along with 11 Nepalese nationals in a military aircraft โ not the more than 180 it had planned โ as others could not reach the airport to board the aircraft.
India, which sees the Taliban as ally of Pakistan, had maintained close ties with the Northern Alliance, which defeated the Afghan armed group in 2001 with the help of the US-led NATO forces.
โIndia has gone from being Kabulโs closest regional partner to one of the regionโs most disadvantaged players in an Afghanistan context,โ said Michael Kugelman, deputy director of the Asia programme at the US-based Wilson Center.
Echoing similar sentiments, Happymon Jacob from New Delhiโs Jawaharlal Nehru University, said: โI think India seems to be out of the game in Afghanistan.โ
He told Al Jazeera in the last 20 years India played a positive role in Afghanistan, but at present Indiaโs diplomacy was almost โnon-existentโ in the country and its stakes have โdramatically decreasedโ.
โToo late in reaching out to the Talibanโ
Some foreign policy mandarins have pointed out India was too late in reaching out to the Taliban to secure its interests, as reports emerged that Indian officials met the Taliban in the Qatari capital, Doha, in June. The Taliban established a political office in Doha in 2013.
Kugelman said two factors went against New Delhi: โIndiaโs reluctance to reach out to the Taliban until it was too late, and an ill-fated Afghan reconciliation process with a deep Pakistani footprint, owing to its ties to the Taliban.โ
India helped build the Afghan parliament building at a cost of $90m [File: Reuters]
The Afghan reconciliation process was an outcome of the agreement between the Taliban and the US signed in February 2020.
โOne deprived India of potential leverage, and the other put New Delhi at a geopolitical disadvantage,โ Kugelman told Al Jazeera.
India has been wary of the Taliban, given its proximity to Pakistanโs military spy agency the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), while Islamabad has accused New Delhi of using Afghan soil to โcarrying out terror activitiesโ.
โThe Taliban takeover delivers a body blow to Indiaโs strategic interests,โ said Kugelman.
โAfghanistan will now have a pro-Pakistan government, and this will give Pakistan and Indiaโs other key rival, China โ Pakistanโs close friend โ an opportunity to play more of a role in Afghanistan.
โThere will also be security risks, because the Taliban takeover will galvanise regional militants, including anti-India terror groups.โ
โWait and watchโ
During its first stint in power, from 1996-2001, the Taliban faced international isolation as it was recognised by only three countries โ Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
But things seem to be different this time as regional powers such as China, Russia, and Iran have indicated they may work with the Taliban to secure their interests.
President Ashraf Ghani, right, with whom New Delhi cultivated a close relationship, fled the country as the Taliban surrounded Kabul.
Indiaโs former External Affairs Minister Kunwar Natwar Singh, last week in an interview suggested New Delhi should establish diplomatic ties with the Taliban if it functions as a โresponsible governmentโ.
But Indiaโs former ambassador to Afghanistan, Gautam Mukhopadhaya, said the situation is still evolving and nothing has crystallised yet.
โWe donโt even have a transitional administration yet [in Afghanistan],โ he told Al Jazeera, adding the Western-backed Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is still the recognised government of the country at the United Nations.
โI think for the time being we have to wait and watch.โ
Kugelman, however, said Indiaโs only option in Afghanistan is to try to reach out to the Taliban again, as โunpalatable a choice as that may beโ.
At a minimum, establishing informal links with the Taliban government would put New Delhi in a stronger position to ensure that its assets and investments in Afghanistan arenโt imperilled, he said.

